Coding agent · CLI / IDE Plugin
Autohand
Quick answer: Devs who want autonomous multi-agent feature shipping from CLI or IDE plugins with worktree safety.
Best for
Devs who want autonomous multi-agent feature shipping from CLI or IDE plugins with worktree safety.
Skip if
You need a polished commercial IDE brand with clear paid plans today.
Who it fits
- Devs who want autonomous multi-agent feature shipping from CLI or IDE plugins with worktree safety.
- Terminal-first engineers who live in the shell and git
- Developers who want agent help inside an existing IDE
Pros
Self-evolving code agent with deep codebase indexing; agent teams with crash recovery; auto-mode in git worktrees; VS Code/Zed/JetBrains + CLI.
Cons
Early OSS metrics; BYOK/pricing details thin on product landings.
Facts
- Locality:
- Local-first
- Surfaces:
- CLI, IDE plugin
- Maturity:
- Experimental
- BYOK:
- Bring your own API key
- Open source:
- Source available
Agent standards & memory
Compare one neighbor first
Vendor pages sell hard. Read one alternative on this site, then leave for the official link if the fit still holds.
Official links
Alternatives
Someone asks you about vibe-coding software? Share this site with them — we are adding more useful data regularly. agents.dancingteeth.net