Agent orchestrator · Orchestrator (Desktop ADE)
Coldtea
Quick answer: Teams already on Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI, or OpenCode who want one desktop ADE for parallel agent panes, visual QA on PR previews, and production-watch repair PRs.
Best for
Teams already on Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI, or OpenCode who want one desktop ADE for parallel agent panes, visual QA on PR previews, and production-watch repair PRs.
Skip if
You live in Cursor (unsupported), want a single OSS coding CLI, or refuse a TeaHouse account around the agents you already run.
Who it fits
- Teams already on Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI, or OpenCode who want one desktop ADE for parallel agent panes, visual QA on PR previews, and production-watch repair PRs.
- People who prefer a dedicated desktop coding surface
Pros
Desktop ADE that launches the CLIs you already use (Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI, OpenCode) in visible terminal panes as a team; Matcha visual QA agents turn plain-English web/mobile journeys into self-healing tests on PR previews; monitoring agents watch production (errors, feedback, sessions) and open repair PRs; optional cloud background tasks from a synced board; local-first — code stays on your machine unless you turn cloud on.
Cons
Not a coding agent SKU — you still install and auth Claude Code/Codex/Gemini/OpenCode; Cursor is unsupported; first-run requires a TeaHouse account; pricing not clearly published on the public landing; MCP is a local session endpoint for launched panes, not a public Toolkit MCP.
Facts
- Locality:
- Hybrid (local + cloud)
- Surfaces:
- Desktop
- Maturity:
- Experimental
- MCP:
- Model Context Protocol support
Agent standards & memory
Compare one neighbor first
Vendor pages sell hard. Read one alternative on this site, then leave for the official link if the fit still holds.
Official links
Alternatives
Someone asks you about vibe-coding software? Share this site with them — we are adding more useful data regularly. agents.dancingteeth.net