Coding agent · CLI (Meta)
Muse Code
Verified Aug 2026
Quick answer: Developers trying Meta’s Muse Spark coding CLI (multi-agent by default) who will explicitly choose Contributor vs Standard pricing as a data-governance decision.
Best for
Developers trying Meta’s Muse Spark coding CLI (multi-agent by default) who will explicitly choose Contributor vs Standard pricing as a data-governance decision.
Skip if
You need BYOK multi-lab routing, refuse train-on-you Contributor terms for customer repos, or want an open-source harness you can audit (Prime Agent / OpenCode / Kilo).
Who it fits
- Developers trying Meta’s Muse Spark coding CLI (multi-agent by default) who will explicitly choose Contributor vs Standard pricing as a data-governance decision.
- Terminal-first engineers who live in the shell and git
Pros
Meta Superintelligence Labs terminal coding agent (beta) powered by Muse Spark 1.2 — multi-agent by default (parallel workers + background reviewers), append-only local event log for crash resume, cookbooks for worktrees/computer-use/GitHub bots; co-trained harness claims better tool use than a generic wrapper.
Cons
Contributor tier (~$0.10 in / $0.20 out) is ~12–21× cheaper than Standard because Meta trains on those prompts/completions and throttles throughput — treat as a governance choice, not just a line item; Standard (~$1.25/$4.25) keeps training off; beta + Meta Model API lock-in; not a BYOK multi-lab harness like OpenCode/Prime Agent.
Facts
- Locality:
- Local-first
- Surfaces:
- CLI
- Maturity:
- Experimental
- BYOK:
- Bring your own API key
- Verified:
- Aug 2026
Agent standards & memory
Compare one neighbor first
Vendor pages sell hard. Read one alternative on this site, then leave for the official link if the fit still holds.
Official links
Alternatives
Someone asks you about vibe-coding software? Share this site with them — we are adding more useful data regularly. agents.dancingteeth.net