Coding agent · CLI
omp
Verified Aug 2026
Quick answer: A Pi-class terminal agent that already has subagents, in-process tools, LSP/DAP, and Windows-native installs — BYOK, MIT, no WSL.
Best for
A Pi-class terminal agent that already has subagents, in-process tools, LSP/DAP, and Windows-native installs — BYOK, MIT, no WSL.
Skip if
You wanted Mario Zechner’s minimal pi.dev harness, or a VS Code fork instead of a TUI.
Who it fits
- A Pi-class terminal agent that already has subagents, in-process tools, LSP/DAP, and Windows-native installs — BYOK, MIT, no WSL.
- Terminal-first engineers who live in the shell and git
Pros
Batteries-included MIT fork of Pi — sessions, subagents, slash commands, 40+ providers; in-process Rust tools (ripgrep, glob, find, bash) so Windows runs native with no WSL; LSP and DAP wired in (rename, format, debug) instead of shelling out; hash-anchored edits plus persistent Python/Bun kernels that can call agent tools; TUI, one-shot `-p`, RPC/ACP, and a Node SDK (`curl | sh`, brew, bun).
Cons
Easy to mix with pi.dev — this is Can Bölük’s oh-my-pi fork, not Mario Zechner’s tiny harness; benchmaxxed landing-page claims; fast npm/version train; heavier than stock Pi if you wanted the minimal agent.
Facts
- Locality:
- Local-first
- Surfaces:
- CLI
- Maturity:
- General availability
- BYOK:
- Bring your own API key
- Open source:
- Source available
- Free tier:
- Free option available
- MCP:
- Model Context Protocol support
- Verified:
- Aug 2026
Agent standards & memory
Compare one neighbor first
Vendor pages sell hard. Read one alternative on this site, then leave for the official link if the fit still holds.
Official links
Alternatives
Someone asks you about vibe-coding software? Share this site with them — we are adding more useful data regularly. agents.dancingteeth.net